A transit report for any period, as a PDF with the evidence attached
What a chosen timeframe adds up to — its themes, its biggest forces, where they converge, the moments to hold — read on screen first, then exported with every figure it rests on.
Most astrology reports are prose with a chart attached. This one is the other way around. Cosmic KPI’s Period Briefing takes a timeframe you choose — the next two weeks, a month, a quarter, the calendar year, the past month, or any custom range up to a year — and answers one question about it: what does all of this add up to? Every sentence it produces is derived from figures the rest of the site already computed for those dates, carries the identities of the transits it came from, and can be exported as a PDF that prints the same curve, the same ranked contacts and the same windows the screen showed.
Read what your next month adds up to →
How it works
The briefing, first
The page opens on the reading: a headline for the period and its central theme; the average and peak pressure with their tier words; the major themes, ranked; the major transits; the convergence windows, where several contacts tighten together; the key moments to hold; and the arc of the period from opening to close, with the methodology stated beneath it. Each of these is a synthesis over results the canonical surfaces already produced — day scores from the pressure model, contacts ranked by their contribution across the whole period, timing windows from the same detector the calendar uses. Not one number in the briefing is computed from ephemeris data here; each is passed through unchanged.
The synthesis holds itself to four rules. No second model: nothing is rescored. Deterministic: the same chart, range and settings produce a byte-identical briefing, with every ordering given an explicit tie-break so it cannot drift between runs. Traceable: every generated statement carries the transit and day identities it was derived from, so any sentence can be walked back to the contact that produced it. And it never invents a fact — dates, orbs, houses, scores and aspect names are quoted from the inputs or omitted. Interpretation is generated; facts are copied.
Ranked by the whole period, not by one day
The strongest transit of a period is not the one with the highest single moment. Contacts are ranked by their integrated contribution across the timeframe — how much of the period’s total they account for — so a slow contact that sits near exact for six weeks outranks a fast one that spikes for an afternoon, and the report says which measure it used. The notable days are chosen the same way: the strongest, spaced at least three days apart and not simply five neighbours of one peak, so the section reads as a survey of the period rather than a zoom on its loudest week.
The PDF
Beneath the briefing sits the report setup: a planet filter, on by default for every body except the Moon; toggles for the five sections — briefing, timeline, days, transits, windows; and counts for the notable days and key transits. Generate produces a branded PDF from the same graphics the site renders: the pressure timeline as the app draws it, twenty-four-hour bands for the notable days, the geometry of each key contact, the house wheels it activates, and a contribution arc per contact. The file is composed by the app’s own writer with no external service, and the report is assembled once per timeframe — the screen reads from it, and Generate reuses the same assembly rather than recomputing.
The planet filter is the timeline’s display filter: it selects which transits are drawn and discussed and never changes a score. A report that discusses only the outer planets still prints the full curve.
What it does not do
The briefing does not predict events. It states the shape of a period in the model’s own vocabulary — which themes carry weight, when contacts converge, which days stand out — and it labels the quality of what it finds with the model’s words rather than promising outcomes. A reader who wants to know what a contact means is sent to the research library; a reader who wants to know what happened is sent to their own notebook.
Trying it
The Period Briefing and the PDF are part of Pro. On a free account the page shows the briefing’s structure with its substance held back, so what a report contains is visible before it is bought. The same pipeline produces the synastry report for a pair of charts.
Common questions
- What periods can the report cover?
- The next fourteen, thirty or ninety days, this calendar year, the past thirty days, or a custom range from two days to a year. Pro accounts can place the range anywhere the timeline can reach.
- Is the PDF the same as what I see on screen?
- Yes. The briefing on screen and the PDF are produced from one assembled report, and the PDF’s graphics are the site’s own — the pressure timeline, day bands, contact geometry and house wheels drawn by the same code.
- How are the “major transits” chosen?
- By integrated contribution across the whole period, not by peak. A contact that stays near exact for weeks outranks one that spikes for a day, and the report names the measure it used.
- Does the report tell me what will happen?
- No. It sums up the measured shape of a period — themes, convergences, notable days — in the model’s vocabulary, quotes every figure from the canonical surfaces, and leaves the reading of it to you.
Read what your next month adds up to
Cosmic KPI assembles the briefing from the same canonical figures the timeline shows, and exports it as a PDF with the evidence attached.
Open Period Briefing in Cosmic KPI →